Viper (maker of car alarms and remote starters) sent me a PR kit for a new system which will allow you to remote start your car with your Apple iphone.
It looks neat, because you can start your car even if it isn't within direct line-of-sight; the system communicates between the iphone and the car over the cellular network.
However, there are a couple of things I wonder about. First, the cost: after the first year, it costs $30/year for service. Is that worth it? Not to me, when I can have a service-fee free line-of-sight remote starter.
Secondly, I wonder about the safety implications of being able to remote start your car without being near it. All remote starters have a cut-off timer which kills the engine if you don't come and open the car within a certain amount of time, typically about 10 minutes. But without being able to see your car, you have no idea if there is some unsafe situation where you wouldn't want to be starting a car.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Friday, October 9, 2009
Cash For Clunkers Credit Not Taxable
I have gotten one of those chain emails purporting to show that the CARS program (cash-for-clunkers) actually costs you more money than you save if your car had some trade in value. The email is based on a false premise, that the credit is taxable. It is not. According to the CARS.GOV web site (here),
Also, for 2009, the sales taxes on a new car purchase are tax deductible.
The CARS Act expressly provides that the credit is not income for the consumer.
Also, for 2009, the sales taxes on a new car purchase are tax deductible.
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Future Cop Cars
Now that GM has announced that they will bring their Australian RWD V8 sedan to the U.S. as a police car, there is a clearer picture of what the U.S. police car market is going to look like in the next few years.
2011 Chevrolet Caprice
RWD, 6.0L V8, 355HP, ~4000lb, 0-60 in 5.3s (G8 numbers)
Based on the same platform as the recently departed G8.
2011 Ford Taurus (rumored)
FWD/AWD GTDI 3.5L 365HP, 4300lb, 0-60 in 5.8s (SHO numbers)
Big and heavy, but quick thanks to twin turbo direct injection. Will the police accept front wheel biased AWD?
2012 Carbon Motors E7 (in development)
RWD 3.0L Diesel ">250HP", 4000lb, 0-60mph 6.5s (planned)
Still a concept car at this point, or vapor-ware for the skeptical, Carbon Motors is working on the design, and the manufacturing plant has not been tooled yet. The E7 will be built on an "aluminum spaceframe" with body panels. Expected to sell for around $60,000 a copy and last for 250,000 miles before being scrapped. This would be the only purpose-built police car in the U.S.
2010 Dodge Charger
For comparison:
Crown Victoria CVPI
RWD 4.6L V8, 250 HP, 4000lb, 0-60 in 7.6s.
2011 Chevrolet Caprice
RWD, 6.0L V8, 355HP, ~4000lb, 0-60 in 5.3s (G8 numbers)
Based on the same platform as the recently departed G8.
2011 Ford Taurus (rumored)
FWD/AWD GTDI 3.5L 365HP, 4300lb, 0-60 in 5.8s (SHO numbers)
Big and heavy, but quick thanks to twin turbo direct injection. Will the police accept front wheel biased AWD?
2012 Carbon Motors E7 (in development)
RWD 3.0L Diesel ">250HP", 4000lb, 0-60mph 6.5s (planned)
Still a concept car at this point, or vapor-ware for the skeptical, Carbon Motors is working on the design, and the manufacturing plant has not been tooled yet. The E7 will be built on an "aluminum spaceframe" with body panels. Expected to sell for around $60,000 a copy and last for 250,000 miles before being scrapped. This would be the only purpose-built police car in the U.S.
2010 Dodge Charger
RWD 5.7L V8 340HP, 4000lb, 0-60 in 6.2s
The old man of this group, the Charger platform will have been in production for 6 years by the time 2011-12 arrives.
The old man of this group, the Charger platform will have been in production for 6 years by the time 2011-12 arrives.
For comparison:
Crown Victoria CVPI
RWD 4.6L V8, 250 HP, 4000lb, 0-60 in 7.6s.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Survey: Customers Regret Buying Small Cars
The Pittsburg Post-Gazette (link) has an interesting article about sagging demand for small cars in the face of cheaper gas. AutoPacific did a study that asked buyers of small cars what they thought of their purchase, and unsurprisingly (to me), many indicated they'd rather go large next time.
"This is buyer's remorse," said George Peterson, president of AutoPacific, "What they said in the study is they want a bigger car. They bought a fuel efficient car, but now they're saying, 'It does what I want, but it doesn't have what I want. It doesn't have the features, the power, the room, and next time I'll opt for a bigger car.' "In general, I think the auto companies expect that gas will be more expensive in the longer term, and with the 35.5mpg CAFE standards coming for 2016, will be pushing small cars more aggressively than ever.
In the AutoPacific study, based on more than 32,000 new car and light truck buyers in the United States, 30 percent said they wanted more power than they have in their current small car, 25 percent wanted more cargo room, 18 percent want more room in general, and 25 percent want more technology. In addition, 22 percent wanted a softer ride, and 18 percent wanted more safety.
What this research tells us is that in order to have satisfied small customers, carmakers need to offer cars that are comfortable, have good cargo space, good acceleration, and lots of gadgets. In other words, well equipped smaller cars. Which is exactly what the carmakers are working on.
Over the next few years, we will be seeing mainstream European style small cars in this country, such as the Chevrolet Cruze and Volt, Ford Fiesta and Focus, Fiat 500. These will be fun to drive, solidly built, and well equipped.
And, in a departure from what most consumers are used to, the new crop of small cars will not be cheap. We can expect to be seeing $20,000 price stickers for our "econoboxes" in the future.
Honda Crosstour?
I haven't digested all of its stats and photos yet, but from what I see so far, the Honda Crosstour looks like an answer to a question no one asked: "Can you make a cheaper copy of the BMW X6?". To me, the Crosstour looks like a big compromise. I also hope it looks better in person than in the photos, because the photos show me a whole lot of ugly.
Edmunds has some photos and commentary here.
Edmunds has some photos and commentary here.
GM Sort Of Leaving RenCen?
According to a story in the Detroit News (here), GM is considering moving many employees out of downtown Detroit's only modern high-rise, the Renaissance Center, to fill in the empty offices in Warren, where many of the designers and engineers sit. GM tried to sell the RenCen and then rent it back recently, but couldn't find a buyer. And Warren's mayor recently campaigned to have GM move its headquarters entirely back to Warren.
It's bad for Detroit, which is already teetering on insolvency, but GM has to look out for GM. If Warren is better for cash flow, then Warren should win.
It's bad for Detroit, which is already teetering on insolvency, but GM has to look out for GM. If Warren is better for cash flow, then Warren should win.
Monday, October 5, 2009
How A V6 Beats A V8
Q: How does a V6 out-run a V8 with more displacement?
A: On a high altitude hill climb where the V6 has twin-turbos compressing the intake air, while the V8's run at effectively 60% of their displacement.
Still, it is sort of neat to see a V6 from Ford spank a Maserati at something. Link: http://www.6versus8.com/showdown/intro/index.html
A: On a high altitude hill climb where the V6 has twin-turbos compressing the intake air, while the V8's run at effectively 60% of their displacement.
Still, it is sort of neat to see a V6 from Ford spank a Maserati at something. Link: http://www.6versus8.com/showdown/intro/index.html
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)